data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea278/ea2789e743d8be59c2db40fb75d2211516c96aaa" alt=""
WEIGHT: 54 kg
Breast: E
1 HOUR:60$
NIGHT: +70$
Sex services: Massage, Slave, Golden shower (in), Hand Relief, Toys
Why is unity better than dispersion? One can hardly see how this question could pertain to scientific knowledge such as Comte conceived it. It seems, however, that for philosophers who reduce all our knowledge to phenomena and turn away from being, unity becomes, as it were, a functional substitute for being -- the more they forget the metaphysical significance of unity, the more they cling to this transcendental.
At any rate, no other philosopher had more nostalgia for unity than Comte. It was also quite clear to him that the science of phenomena cannot satisfy the need for unity of the human intellect. And since for him no other science was possible -- in other words, since he had completely de-ontologized knowledge and denied philosophy any right to an independent domain and way of knowing -- it was clear to him that intellectual unity could not have its source in the object, or in the "objective synthesis".
It is in turning to the subject -- the universal subject, humanity -- that Comte claims to have discovered the hierarchy of the sciences, and, in general, the possibility of regulating scientific research and unifying the work of the intellect. The fact remains that since it is not by integrating themselves to a higher objective truth that the sciences can be unified, it can only be by their subordinating themselves to the needs and practical utility of the subject.
It is also clear that unity of the understanding alone is in no way enough. The whole man must be unified. In other words, intellectual and spiritual unity, really capable of reaching the entire man, cannot be the work of the intellect all by itself, even if it coordinates and directs the sciences from the point of view of the subject.
Only in becoming entirely subordinate to feeling and this is quite logical, because no truth superior to phenomena -- whether the suprasensible truths of metaphysics, or the first truth of the revelation -- is accessible to intelligence can the intellect become a real instrument of human unification.