To your casual observer, that surely suggests that hundreds of traffickers were arrested during the operation, which took place from January 26 through February 1. And with a few careful language tricks, police are happy to stoke this impression.
But dig a little deeper and it becomes clear that this whole operation is a mirage, designed to give the impression that police are playing heroes instead of consensual sex cops. If only of the arrests involved "exploiters," that means a full arrests were for unrelated charges. The LAPD doesn't say for what, but it could mean that women were also arrested for prostitution, as is often the case in so-called human trafficking stings. Such stings also tend to be used as catchall petty-crime dragnets, picking up people for things like drug possession, driving on an expired license, owning a gun without the right permits, or having outstanding warrants.
Still, "exploiters" would be a lotβ if the term here actually meant people guilty of sexual exploitation. But law enforcement now tends to lump prostitution customers in with sex traffickers, counting any attempt to pay a consenting adult for sex as exploitation. It's very likely that the vast majority of these "exploiters" merely face a solicitation charge. This assumption is backed up by information from the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office , which reports that only one person was charged with trafficking of a minor for a commercial sex act.
Three additional people were charged with "pandering"βthat is, facilitating prostitutionβand one person was charged with pimping, according to the D.
So with arrests in this "human trafficking sting," we get oneβone! The D. But cops always say that. It's a convenient way to put off people who might question the premises of their sting. Sure, sure, only one charge now, but there could be more coming later!
