I know some of you would probly prefer that this movie just be forgotten, but considering all the discussion and confusion we had a few months ago about outlawvern. There are two major additions:. Snyder says that the scene was cut because he was worried that it made the brothel look like too much of a fun time.
I believe this was cut to get a PG rating, because the scene is about him trying to convince her to consent to having sex with him in exchange for freedom.
So it makes it explicit what was already heavily implied in the theatrical cut, that she willingly let herself be lobotomized so that she could be free of the misery of having killed her sister and all that.
Also seeing the scene makes it seem to make more sense that Jon Hamm is in the movie, because he used to have a big scene. They play better longer in my opinion. Okay, so when I first saw the movie I had a pretty straight forward interpretation of what was going on. And then I noticed some reviews where it was clear that the writers had thought some sort of deal like that took place at the end.
One thing that Snyder does not talk about at all in the extras as far as I noticed is the one and only thing that the entire internet fixated on when the movie came out: gender. Well, the problem is with the construction of the story I guess. I still thought it was an interesting movie that ultimately fails as a story. But what really struck me this time is that whether or not he intended it as a deconstruction of geek culture, gender roles, whatever various sources claimed it was supposed to be a deconstruction of it accidentally is a deconstruction in the sense that he delivers several knock-you-on-your-ass great action sequences but puts them in a context where almost everybody hated them.
